Skip to main content

Notes on Culture and Primitive Man

Primitive humans, through their lived experience, lived lives that were wholly satisfying: they engaged in work that was meaningful and personal, they had constant challenges and mental stimulation, an unrestricted sense of autonomy, and a sense of adventure belying the entire thing. Humans had no choice but to derive meaning from a life that was exhilarating at every moment. Every choice was meaningful and required an unparalleled trust in one’s ability to overcome the next obstacle. It was an enduring but highly satisfying test to see if you had what it took to have mastery over life. 

And in our chase toward rapid industrialization, we have lost the personal touch of what it means to be human. Many of the activities we engage in are indeed surrogates for that which were once accomplished and deemed satisfying by primitive man. Take video games or movies, for example. One engages in adventurous, dramatic, action-packed, or otherwise exhilarating genres to induce pleasure in oneself. It allows one to feel that they are the active participant in such an exhilarating story, however it may be in part to account for a lack of such exhilaration in one’s life. One did not need to consume a crafted adventure experience as a primitive human, as life was adventurous enough everyday. A constant struggle in life provided boundless obstacles to overcome, and cultivated a strength of will that seems absent today. 

There was no absence of good feelings as a primitive human, and the myopic and regressive view that it was a “dark age” seems to propagate this idea that there was only misery to be found in primitive life. Make no mistake, the life was not easy in physical terms, but it was the least miserable existence from the perspective of satisfying the human condition. Every day truly was a victory to be celebrated and acknowledged in the mind. Meaning was created through engaging in natural life and actions, rather than through satisfying an expectation placed upon them by a limiting framework (such as the conventional “work until you retire” American culture). One was in complete control of his life and bowed to no master. 

Even in our modern capitalist society we see remnants of these primitive desires. We encourage a self-starter type of person, who “takes control of their life and doesn’t work for anybody.” We encourage people to be “authentic” and “true to themselves.” We tell people to follow this free and liberating path, but it comes with one glaring caveat: You can only do it if it helps contribute to our system. As Jean-Jacques Rousseau once said, “Man is born free but everywhere he is in chains.” Humans cannot be truly made to create meaning for themselves in such a rigid world; a society that influences thought is by nature limiting a human in their ability to be free. Ideology immediately takes hold of the mind and removes the true and unaffected potential of man from birth. And again, a life that is truly liberating would allow its ends to be seen without the influence of established cultural paradigms serving as limiting factors.

The only way to be truly content and realized in this iteration of society, as someone who has truly broken free of its invisible chains, is to withdraw from it entirely. Because only then can you start acting outside of its grasp, in ways that don’t reinforce it, but rather question it. What you demonstrate, in action, is an ability to truly be free. It is in itself, a revolutionary act, and I’d argue a very powerful form of civil disobedience. But withdrawal is often derided by people because they see it as “running away.” What they fail to realize is that only if a person decides to isolate themselves would they be running away — if the person establishes a community, however, they are creating the beginnings of a new consciousness, of a new society. They are running away from your society, but through that action creating something entirely new. They are acting outside of the framework provided to them at birth and instilled in them through years and years of cultural integration. And it appeals to the primitive nature of man: a desire to be free, a desire to be autonomous, and a desire to create meaning. It is a natural desire, so to speak. 

Culture creates false meaning for us and obfuscates our natural desires. It makes it easy for individuals to think shallowly about their wants and needs and let an external entity decide that for them. Again, a mere surrogate for what was once the everyday experience. It’s bizarre that our “impossible” goals, such as happy, fruitful, and meaningful lives for everyone, were possible at one point. They are only impossible now because we have made them so. We have gained much in material from our pursuit of industrialization, but we are losing far more that is intrinsically human.

The only man that was ever truly free was primitive man.

Comments

  1. There are various fantasies about the life of the "Noble Savage". Most of them assume a physically primitive mode of existence was not complemented by abstractive thinking such as is evidenced in artworks including textiles, carved & painted utilitarian items & religious rites such as burial, air or water burial or cremation. Seasonal imperatives in climate, diet & housing could make lifestyle nomadic or refugial & interactions with others with similar problems could advance the need for exchange systems including marriage & language development but also conflict & destruction.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

To Care Beyond Yourself

We humans are an entertaining bunch, aren't we? At one moment we care for our neighbors, we nurture our communities, and are joined in solidarity when tragedy strikes. At another moment, we find ourselves viciously reaching for each others' throats for the most trivial and banal of opinions. We seem to be in constant flux, feeling the desire for great love and care whilst simultaneously feeling the desire for great violence and dominion over those we view as inferior. What a precarious situation we seem to find ourselves in on a day to day basis; we care too much for others at the expense of ourselves, or we care too much about ourselves that we crush others and leave them by the wayside. Of course, the world doesn't always function in such moral absolutes. We all do what is in our best interest, after all. But how do we know that what we're doing is in our best interest? I'd argue that more often than not, we are absolutely clueless. The world and universe seem to

A Common Enemy

Many works of art in history have demonstrated an idea of human unity: the idea that, if faced with a disaster that seeks to destroy humanity, we will all forget all of our minor transgressions and band together as one race to fight the enemy head-on. Whether the media presents it as an alien invasion, a meteor, a great evil wizard, or some other seemingly insurmountable threat, the core concept remains, which is that through our collective power, we can stand up to any enemy, no matter how terrifying or powerful. This is especially useful in the act of warfare. The way Americans united against the Japanese threat by interning Japanese-Americans in camps on their own soil. The way the profiling of Muslims increased after 9/11, as Americans were thoroughly convinced that Muslims are far more dangerous than other people. The amount of civilians and innocent people that have been eliminated from the face of the Earth for no other reason than in the name of “freedom” and “democracy,” which